Attention Norwin: Alex Needs Your Help! (Part 1)
I have AIDS. I need your help.
Happy Cinco de Mayo, you Norwinian drunks.
You do know that this holiday, hardly celebrated in Mexico, was promoted in the US by beer and liquor companies in the 80s as a means to sell more alcohol, with sales now close to what is consumed during the Super Bowl? And this day is supposed to celebrate a smaller battle that Mexicans won against the French, only to lose to them at a larger battle at the same location a year later. I don’t get it, but hey… let’s go to Madero and celebrate… <awkward silence>… OK, we’ll talk about that later in this article.
But you didn’t come here to be educated about history. You were drawn here because you wanted to be entertained, and maybe, learn something in the process about Norwin… and then do nothing with that information, like you’ve done for the past 5 years.
So I thought this last article needed the most appropriate title, coming full circle, evoking the title of the article that led to the second censure and second lawsuit against the District. It was always my intention to have each new article outdo the satirical literary prowess of the previous article. It was hard, but sometimes, you had to settle. You took what you could get, just like a swingin’ Norwinian cock whore whose repertoire hasn’t expanded since they shut down the swinger club on Turner Valley Road. I tried to inform you through my entertaining writing, but it clearly didn’t motivate you to make change. You stupid and ungrateful fucks don’t deserve any more insight because you clearly don’t know what to do with it.
Therefore, this final article is for me. All my final thoughts. A necessary bookend to an interesting five year chapter in my life. I am going to digitally bind all my articles to create a memoir that I can look back upon when I’m gone from this area, watching it crash and burn from afar, asking the question: “What was I thinking that made me believe this place was worth saving?” Email me with the magic words “I’m a Retarded Communist Faggot” in the subject line and I’ll send you a copy.
This final article is my best work.
It’s too long for the short-attention span of a typical Norwinian, so just like my two-parter “Who Are the Fucking Idiots in My Neighborhood,” this series will be broken down into eight parts over the course of the next three weeks, ending before the start of summer break. My readership numbers always went down during the summer, so I wouldn’t want you lazy fucks to miss out on getting educated.
Here’s your first load of awesomeness:
This article was going to come out a lot earlier — around February, penned as a love letter to Norwin — but I had too much content to share and was never going to timely finish it — I don’t get paid to amuse you simpletons. That article was going to start off with yet another condemnation of the then-upcoming Creepy Father-Daughter Dance, but I’m sure there’s another one planned for next year, so still consider this a timely criticism.
This shit needs to stop. I’m not going to reinvent the wheel of well-deserved shaming, so here’s a copy of the text from my article last year on this topic. It’s bad enough that this town has the highest per capita percentage of Megan’s Law offender listings compared to the rest of the County, but hey, let’s offer a creepy event subsidized by the taxpayers. Seriously, I’m living in retardville. Who the hell approves this?
excerpt from article “What’s Love Got to Do With It — Feb 15, 2025”
Attempting to inject romantic themes into wholly inappropriate areas... is... well, inappropriate. And this is where the creepy father-daughter dances are indicted. There are definite parallels to the outrageous purity balls which I wouldn’t be surprised are a thing some evangelical fundies in Norwin subscribe to. Purity balls, are rooted in puritanical religious beliefs that a father owns his daughter and her sexuality, and determines when it’s appropriate to give them to another man. That’s certainly not the case with a father-daughter dance (I would hope it’s not!), but there are still many psychological layers of ickiness that can be peeled away.
The only pro argument, a very tenuous one, for this dance is that it provides bonding time with one’s daughter. However, if a dad wants to spend quality time with his daughter, then awesome, go have tea-time together, take her to a painting/baking class, go bumper bowling, toss her around in the pool, maybe have her watch you throw lead downrange while she reloads for you (ok, maybe that last one is not fun for any female), etc. Father-daughter bonding can be achieved in so many ways. Why does this event occur around Valentine’s Day, which is a day traditionally associated with love between a man and a woman.
Look, you don’t need to spend daddy-daughter time in a dating context, with both of you dressed up as if you’re going to prom, in a prince-princess, “fairytale fantasy” world, at “$100 per couple.” What an odd way to put it. Where is the mother-son dance? Why not just call it a Family Dance and hold it in April and remove all creepiness, real or perceived? But I understand, the narcissistic Instagram mommies want to outdo each other with the best husband-daughter “couples” photo. It’s not cute. It’s as weird as you are.
If you feel so strongly about playing cowboy dress-up with girls, then this place is more appropriate, you perverts:
You can see I feel strongly about anything that harms kids, which is what got me motivated to run for school board during the Covid scamdemic. OK, now back to our originally-scheduled evisceration. I promise to limit the rehashing of old content, but some of it is just too good to not repeat. But, I understand — you didn’t go to the painstaking effort of pulling up this site to read recycled literary works of art? No, you want fresh meat just like a Norwinian swingin’ cock whore who has frustratingly scrolled through her BBC booty-call contact list hoping that it has somehow changed from the night before.
Going Out On Top
Can we take a moment to realize what a badass move it was for me to serve the most recent lawsuit complaint at a board meeting, the last meeting where I was still considered an elected official. I didn’t attend and these retarded communist faggots thought I had just faded away and then BAM, they get hit with a lawsuit naming the District and the Manboob 5 and RINO Ray Kocak in their individual capacity as defendants, and then appearing in the news a week before the holidays started…
After past Norwin superintendent, faggoty putz Jeff Taylor, Ed.D., retaliated against me in 2022 (resulting in my first pending lawsuit where I posted a political meme in which I rightfully called masked and vaxxed virtue signalers retarded), I decided to further test the legal limits of retaliation for exercising private citizen, protected speech. I decided to create an online persona that was going to be as nasty as I wanted it to be.
This persona was going to author literary masterpieces with each successive blog post being more vulgar and over the top than the preceding one. The presentation would be satirical, degrading anything and everything that my political opponents, deviants, apathetic sportsball piss beer drinking slobs, or low IQ miscreants of Norwin would view as personally insulting and offensive. I was counting on a high likelihood of being censured again, necessitating yet another lawsuit against the District. However, I didn’t know exactly what would trigger these retarded communist faggots to retaliate. I had posted almost monthly for a year using every expletive and criticism and still nothing. Goddammit, what does a man need to do around here to get another unconstitutional first amendment retaliation lawsuit?!
I was getting anxious. Did they learn from the first time they censured me? No, that can’t be it. They aren’t that smart. Shit, what have I done wrong to not get another censure?!?! Time is running out. What have I not done… hmmm… that’s it! I didn’t insult the Manboobers directly. All this time I was as blind and dumb as RINO Ray Kocak. So I said, it’s now or never, Alex. Make the most satirically derogatory post you can make and so “Attention Norwin: Trump Needs Your Help” was born. They took the bait! All that hard work to amuse you ungrateful fucks paid off. And so we’re off to the races, again, and now I can take a multi-prong approach across all claims and both lawsuits to provide myself with the best chance for success.
Breakin’ the Law!
Let me warn you that you’ll probably view this first part to “Attention Norwin: Alex Needs Your Help!” as boring (even though it’s the most fun and exciting part for me). And that’s understandable, as it’s an exercise in intellectualism and we know that Norwin and that big word I just used are fundamentally incompatible, like oil and water… fire and ice (I think the latter is a DJ’s Island Swingers Theme Night).
DISCLAIMER: There is no disparagement of the District in this article — criticisms of individuals and groups that work for or represent the District are fair game and need to be called out for retardation, communism, and faggotry. Plus, I have not signed any non-disparagement agreement to which the District is the adverse party. My lawsuits against the District and any Right-to-Know documents published or linked to are public records. Private email and text communications have been redacted. No copyright claims can exist in government-created works. All other copyrighted work is transformative and/or used for parody with appropriate attribution. Any reference to living or dead retarded communist faggots is in fact, purely intentional.
Anyway, the premise of the lawsuits is simple — if individual admin or board members want to post on their personal social media in response to private citizen speech they disagree with, they are free to do so, but they can’t use taxpayer resources vis-a-vis the District’s disparate power imbalance and reach to retaliate against private citizen, protected speech. Those four words are critical and the court already ruled that my meme was just that. I expect the same for the second lawsuit. The only remaining issue is whether the District can retaliate under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights).
Let’s call the first lawsuit the “Retard Lawsuit” and the second lawsuit the “Manboob Lawsuit” although, technically, they are both retarded and should never have been filed had we not had retards at the helm in Norwin, but here we are. I’m honestly convinced that the administration, Manboobers (now there are two extra ones, but still a full board of retarded communist faggots), and solicitor do not understand the principles of first amendment speech and the limits to retaliation by a government body. Similarly, the retarded communist faggots of Norwin will continue with their nonsensical “freedom of speech, but not freedom from consequences” rhetoric because, likewise, they are too stupid to understand the nuances of free speech law.
I’m not going to post the entire docket — you can pull that up yourself — but here are the links to the Briefs (the substantive filings with the arguments) in each case:
Retard Lawsuit
Manboob Lawsuit
If you really have nothing else meaningful to do this summer (no, you depraved swingers… breaking your marriage vows by getting your holes filled by Jamaican juice outside of the country is neither meaningful, nor an ethical workaround to cheating), you can educate yourself on how communism is being challenged or use it to fall asleep. I know you lazy fucks can’t even be bothered to read long substacks (hence, me breaking up this final article), so I don’t expect you to read the legal Briefs.
The Retard Lawsuit and the Manboob Lawsuit share very similar counts (i.e., the legal claims being asserted) both directed to retaliation for my online speech and placing me in a false light. The Manboob Lawsuit also includes a count directed about the “speech police” attempting to interrogate me, preventing me from leaving a room at the admin building. I will post snippets from the Manboob lawsuit since it shares the same arguments for retaliation and false light as that of the Retard Lawsuit.
Of course, we’re going to have the law school grads from Google University of AI slop chime in with their flawed legal analysis “The Manboob 5 Board can say anything they want because they have free speech, too!” — no retards, it doesn’t work that way, but I can see how you feel that way being communists.
One way to prove retaliation, based on the case law of the Third Circuit, is to show that the Manboob 5 retaliatory speech (the censure based on its wording of: “several offensive comments of a graphic sexual nature directed to one or more of his fellow female and male School Board Directors”), is not considered a matter of public concern:
If speculation on board member prison ass rape (no matter the degree of faggotry for any of them) is not a matter of public concern, then a simple analysis is performed asking whether the censure “was sufficient to deter a person of ordinary firmness from exercising his constitutional rights.” It absolutely was.
Alternatively, if the content of the censure is considered a matter of public concern, then the Court inquires if a censure is considered to be retaliation of a “virulent character” — whether there was “a threat, coercion, or intimidation, intimating that punishment, sanction, or adverse regulatory action will follow.” I set forth in my Brief that a censure is a punishment, an adverse regulatory action, and a sanction. In my Retard Lawsuit (which has multiple amended complaints and Briefs in it by now), the judge asked that I provide case law that shows where a censure is considered a sanction. I said, Your Honor, it would be my honor, and I provided the following:
After an exhaustive search of District Court decisions in all the federal Circuits, what do I find, but in our very own District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, a decision where the court identifies a censure as being a sanction. That’s game! Maybe.
As indicated above, the retardation (and bad legal advice) of the Manboob 5 + RINO Ray Kocak, resulted in retaliation against an elected official’s private citizen protected speech. Enter, Houston Community College System v. Wilson, 142 S.Ct. 1253 (2022), a recent US Supreme Court case where the Court ruled that a censure by an elected board is not considered a retaliation under Section 1983 because this Wilson guy was engaged in board-related activity that was pissing off the other board members. This case is what the Manboob 5 relies on to show that censures are not First Amendment retaliatory acts. However, I point out that in Houston Community:
…and that the speech for which I’m being censured, unlike that in Houston Community, has jack shit to do with the business of the Norwin School District… unless the Manboob 5 offer a board resolution that recognizes the Manboob’s titties as not being larger than that of Nina’s or a one-sided Ryan Kirsch PowerPoint presentation informing us why taxes are going to go up again for the third straight year… with the results of a survey tacked onto the end informing us that the Manboob 5 do not enjoy prison rape. None of this happens on the Board except the showing that the Manboob 5 can’t trim any fat and relies on continued tax increases for overpaid admin and nepotistic hiring.
As is the case with communist-think, the Manboob 5 make the argument that my speech is their business 24 hours a day, 365 days a year because all behavior of board members relates to the District’s “Core Shared Values:”
And I say, your “core shared values” argument is something only a commie piece of shit would subscribe to:
This is where I believe the Manboob 5 done fucked up. The Manboob 5 could have (and should have) lobbed censure after censure (like every month) at me for anything I wrote on my private substack, written on my own time with my own resources, that was related to District business (I disagee with the interpretation of the law that would allow for that, but it is what it is). For example, my literary prowess encompassed illegal students having to clean out their lockers of churro scraps, saving them for their trip to the border in cages. However, I wasn’t censured for that and many other comments critical of the District. It’s as if the Manboob 5 didn’t want to give any more public exposure to the issues I was raising about them running the District into the ground, yet they had no hesitation in censuring me to make me look like I was sexually harassing someone — to falsely attack one’s character — not unlike the socialist Democrat playbook used on the national stage.
I would have welcomed censures relating to my District criticisms! Yes, please censure me and tell the whole world about my conservative views! I’m proud of that and would wear such a censure with pride… straight pride, I mean!
With respect to the second second count, prior to the budget vote meeting, I told Mrs. Baverso: “You can’t vote for the stadium and then not a tax increase. I expect you to be principled and vote for the tax increase.” The Manboob 5 didn’t like me telling the truth to their fifth-deciding vote, the “savior of their extravagant spending fiasco” as I explained to the Court. The Manboob 5 then retaliated with actions, not words. A summary of what happened that evening is found here, with me providing the Court with a legal analysis in my Brief:
In true communist-think fashion, the Manboob 5’s arguments shouldn’t surprise anyone:
Oh, yeah… I understand where they’re coming from: “Veee ver just investigating zee behavior of zee proletariat ciiiitizen who is meeestaken about speaking and associating freely with zee others in za Vaterland.” Except, this is America, motherfuckers, and there’s a Constitution standing in the way of your authoritarianism. Of course, I have to use some decorum when describing my disgust with these commie bastards to the Court:
I then set out a stellar example of why their “investigation” argument is flawed — sometimes you just need to use a bowling alley analogy to make retardation make sense.
My third count sets forth False Light Invasion of Privacy with respect to being accused of sexual harassment, which is explained with more snippets in the “Never go full retard” section.
It’s important to note that I didn’t file these lawsuits just against the District. I filed them against faggoty putz Taylor and the even greater faggoty putzes, the Manboob 5 and RINO Ray Kocak. Unfortunately, there are additional hurdles, like qualified immunity, that need to be overcome to hold people accountable in their individual capacity. As long as these retarded communist faggots can hide behind the shield of their public employment/elected office without fear of personal liability, then they have no incentive to stop retaliating against anyone who is viewed as a threat to their corruption.
Wow, you made it! I can tell you were starting to lose interest… “Hey, look over there! A new person moved into your neighborhood!” (See, I know how to get your focus back, you degenerate swingers!)
Don’t worry, you’re in for a fun ride with the remaining parts to “Attention Norwin: Alex Needs Your Help!”